Trucker Convoy Louisiana, Articles C

The official 2016 election results from the Electoral College gave Donald J. Trump the victory with 306 electoral votes v. Hillary Clinton's 232 votes. Definition and Examples. Maine and Nebraska are the only two states that are not affected by this approach. The bill has crossed paths with 36 legislative chambers and has been sponsored or voted for by 3,112 state legislators (National Popular Vote). Steve Sisolak vetoed it. cons of the national popular vote plan - alshamifortrading.com Either would likely produce an electoral vote count closer to the popular vote. For example: States already have the power to award their electors to the winner of the national popular vote, although this would be disadvantageous to the state that did so unless it was joined simultaneously by other states that represent a majority of electoral votes. National Popular Vote - Pros and Cons "The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire U.S. The candidate who placed second in the popular vote was elected in 2016, 2000, 1888, 1876, and 1824. Since the Constitution and the Bill of Rights became governing documents in the United States, there have only been 17 amendments made to it. Lastly, some Americans believe that there would be an increase in voter turn-out if people felt that their vote was viewed as a significant asset to their country. Instead, it modifies the winner-take-all rule in a way its supporters say would assure that every vote will matter in every state in every presidential election. Colorado is on the verge of joining a nationwide movement that could eventually change how we choose the next president of the United States. (LogOut/ 27 Major Pros & Cons Of The Electoral College - E&C Is It Time to Implement a National Popular Vote in Presidential The Fatally Flawed National Popular Vote Plan | Cato at Liberty Blog To date, the bill has passed at least one legislative chamber in 9 states possessing 82 combined electoral votes: AR, AZ, ME, MI, MN, NC, NV, OK, and OR. Thats the way it has been in this country for a long time. By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. 13 Early College High School Pros and Cons, 18 Major Advantages and Disadvantages of the Payback Period, 20 Advantages and Disadvantages of Leasing a Car, 19 Advantages and Disadvantages of Debt Financing, 24 Key Advantages and Disadvantages of a C Corporation, 16 Biggest Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation, 18 Advantages and Disadvantages of a Gated Community, 17 Big Advantages and Disadvantages of Focus Groups, 17 Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Corporate Bonds, 19 Major Advantages and Disadvantages of Annuities, 17 Biggest Advantages and Disadvantages of Advertising. After all, is said and done, the candidate who attains the largest number of votes can still lose. Louisiana voters should decide who receives Louisiana's electoral votes. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. The electoral college leads to a heavy emphasis on swing states and also typically over-represents citizens in rural states. Using a popular vote system, candidates could campaign regionally, targeting major areas of support, to secure enough votes to win an election. It is also true that no president since 1824 has received the votes of a majority of the eligible voters and 18 presidents, including Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Harry S. Truman, John. Bush and Al Gore (Black). In Maine, both houses of the legislature passed the bill in 2019, but it failed at the final enactment step. That created a voter value of 2.85. 3. By continuing well assume youre on board with our, https://samploon.com/electoral-college-and-national-popular-vote-pros-and-cons/, Select a writer from a large pool of experts. University of Colorado Boulder E pluribus unum -- out of many, one. Under the electoral college system of voting, the number of representatives a state has in Congress (Senators and Representatives) is the total number of electoral votes it is allowed. A popular vote system would significantly impact voters and turnout. Not only it already happened five times, but in theory, a candidate could win the presidency with only 22% of the popular vote in a two-candidates race. It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes, and will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more. We have seen this outcome in the 2016 Presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and in the 2000 election between George H.W. Or the opposite could be true. Most recently, the bill was passed by a bipartisan 4016 vote in the Republican-controlled Arizona House, 2818 in Republican-controlled Oklahoma Senate, 574 in Republican-controlled New York Senate, and 3721 in Democratic-controlled Oregon House." The National Popular Vote Bill is not a Democrat or Republican bill. The Case Against the Popular Vote | The New Republic National Popular Vote Plan page 3 that non-member states that fail to hold such elections will not be included in the determination of 'the national popular vote winner.' This sidesteps the problem and provides an incentive for all states (non-members as well as members) to (continue to) hold such elections. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz often split about 60% of the GOP vote, which allowed Donald Trump to win early primaries with 35% of the vote. Pros And Cons Of Popular Vote - 558 Words | Studymode To take effect, the National Popular Vote bill must be enacted by the state legislatures of states controlling a total of 270 electoral votes - a majority of the overall 538 electoral votes and the number currently required to elect a president. District Plan CONS Technically still possible, but A LOT hard to do so District 1 = Romney 57% District 2 = Romney 52% District 3 = Romney 70% Gerrymandering. The senators in the U.S. Senate make up two votes in addition to the votes that represent the number of its members in the U.S. House of Representatives (Archives). It could help to reduce partisanship. Here are six reasons why legislators should reject this attempt to jettison our electoral system: 1. a plan for a national popular vote could undermine the . 2. In U.S. history, the electoral college winner has failed to secure the popular vote 5 times. After the process, the President of the Senate reveals who has officially been voted in as President and Vice President of the United States. Today, the fact that Nebraska and Maine do not use the winner-take-all system serves as proof that modifying the Electoral College system, as proposed by the National Popular Vote plan is constitutional and does not require a constitutional amendment. 2. Because of the state Winner-Take-All rules, which arent even part of the Constitution, they can lead to presidential elections where the winner of the election doesnt have the most popular votes. 6. The National Bonus Plan was proposed by historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. If the presidential election were switched to the popular vote, then it would only take about 35% of the vote for a candidate to win. Because every vote is equal inside Ohio or Florida, presidential candidates avidly seek out voters in small, medium, and large towns. With a popular vote in place, each election win would be decreed a mandate to follow the platform of the winning party. After the 2016 presidential election, political science expert Nate Silver wrote that, since the swing states are not likely to support any plan that might reduce their influence over control of the White House, the National Popular Vote bill will not succeed unless the predominately Republican red states adopt it. Then, election officials in all participating states would choose the electors sworn to support thepresidential candidate who received the largest number of popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. A close election would trigger the need for a full recount. These battleground or swing states receive 7% more federal grants, twice as many presidential disaster declarations, more Superfund enforcement exemptions, and more No Child Left Behind law exemptions (National Popular Vote). The framers enacted the provisions relating to the Electoral College to allow for state innovation. April 8, 2016 National popular vote far better than Electoral College system for choosing presidents, Stanford professors say. It knows that a majoritarianism that produces a plurality is not the voice of a majority of the citizenry. A Critique of the National Popular Vote October 13, 2008 Policy Analysis No. The years-old effort is slowly making its way through state legislatures in hopes of changing the way All states could adopt the system that now exists in Maine and Nebraska, where all but two electors are chosen by congressional district, and the other two go to the statewide winner. Many Americans are confused about how a win is obtained under these conditions and are on a quest to change this traditional statute. The first problem it creates is the opportunity for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote. Electing a president who did not have broad regional support could lead to a fractured and less cohesive country, according to the Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Under the electoral college system (and other voting systems not based on popular voting), it only takes one extra vote more than the other candidate to create the needed results for the election. And finally, the Electoral College doesnt work today anywhere near how the Founding Fathers intended it to work when they created it back in 1787. Presidential candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, or campaign in states that they cannot possibly win or lose; in 2016, 68% of presidential campaign visits took place in just six states. If the National Popular Vote bill was secured within the American government, it would protect every vote and would allow those votes to equally matter in the presidential election. It isnt impossible to pass a Constitutional amendment, though history shows that it is not an easy process to complete. Many people may feel that any major change in how we elect the president should be in the Constitution and not in a legal loop hole even if its legal and technically constitutional. But with the NPV Compact a change in party control of just one or two states could restore the old system of electing the president and then four years later it could be changed back. It sees a healthy and vibrant democracy needing the underpinnings of civil society that rests on the sustained and active engagement of the citizenry and promotes approaches that seek to maximize that involvement. Many cities and school districts, under threat of a lawsuit by a Malibu attorney, have already adopted or are in the process of changing to district elections rather than remaining citywide or . Join the thousands across the country who instantly rally when there is a threat to our democracy. However that presumably rare exception happened in the 2000 election when Florida could not complete their statewide recount in time for the Electoral College deadline and the Supreme Court forced Florida to use their first vote count without a statewide recount. Electoral votes are designated among the states based on Census. Watch out! The Electoral College was established in the Constitution to protect minority interests and mitigate the possibility of a regional candidate. The National Popular Vote initiative transpired in 2006. Would it aid a fight to eliminate first past the post or would it further entrench the established party system voters American voters have expressed disdain for. In the 2016 election, "swing states" that might vote Republican or Democrat like Wisconsin were targets of candidates Donald J. Trump and Hillary R. Clinton. As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath This blog post is a joint effort with Leslie Francis, former executive director of the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. A popular vote election takes all ballots that are cast, counts them, and declares the winner based on who received the most votes. Unless the national popular vote was very close, or there were all lot of recounts outstanding, the Compact states in most cases would effectively know what the outcome would be and could be prepared to certify their state votes very quickly to make the Electoral College meeting date deadline. 12 Proportional Representation Pros and Cons - Vittana.org To pass an amendment to change the Constitution the Founding Fathers wisely required approval by 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures instead of a simple majority. Two-thirds of the campaign events were in four states, Florida, Iowa, Virginia, and Ohio, that year. Once enacted, the participating states would cast all of their electoral votes for the presidential candidate winning the nationwide popular vote, thus ensuring that candidate the required 270 electoral votes. Each states electoral votes are tallied by Congress in the House chamber by House and Senate representatives on the 6th day of January following the Presidential election. Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Advantages of the NPV Interstate Compact 1. She graduated magna cum laude from Brandeis University with bachelor's degrees in creative writing, English/American literature and international studies. The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. Lastly, the biggest problem that the Electoral College produces is the reality that a persons vote really doesnt matter (Black). In contrast, in a direct popular election, each vote matters equally. Rebekah Richards is a professional writer with work published in the "Atlanta Journal-Constitution," "Brandeis University Law Journal" and online at tolerance.org. Due to some states being heavily populated in comparison to others, that may help a candidate quickly obtain a win. Electoral College and National Popular Vote Pros and Cons There are a number of pros for this method. Under the Electoral College system, voters in states that are overwhelmingly in support of one candidate might feel like their vote is unimportant. The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College - SmartAsset The electoral college is a tradition of American politics that's fairly controversial. For under its plan, the next time the U.S. has very close national vote, a recount would not be of six million votes in one state but of more than 130 million votes in all states and the District of Columbia, all with their own rules for conducting a recount. Secondly, it creates a minimalist depiction in the minds of the candidate towards more than 40 states. Like most issues involving politics, the U.S. Constitution is largely silent on the political issues of presidential elections. In contrast, other issues related to the federal government are not exclusively entrusted to the states, and therefore the states lack the power to alter them. The one-vote approach does not align with the way the electoral votes operates. Yet, by May 2021, 15 states and Washington, D.C., had signed onto the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. When a popular vote is held for a national office, the election becomes more about platform issues than local issues. "The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire U.S. On Dec. 22, 2016, the results were certified in all 50 states. During the 2012 elections, 38 states, also known as spectator states, were ignored and forgotten. Every state is allocated several votes according to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation. June 7, 2022 . What Is The District Plan? This Electoral College Reform - Bustle In fact, let's tally up all the votes cast for president between 1932 and 2008. 805 15th Street, NW, Suite 800 List of the Cons of Proportional Representation. 622 By John Samples The National Popular Vote plan (NPV), introduced in more than 40 states, and adopted. NCSL conducts policy research in areas ranging from agriculture and budget and tax issues to education and health care to immigration and transportation. Removing this system could encourage more people to come out to support their candidate. As of now, 15 states and Washington, D.C. have joined the National Popular Vote compact: Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington, New Jersey, Illinois, New York, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Delaware and Oregon. Constitutional Amendment to Guarantee the Right to Vote for All U.S. Citizens. During a popular vote, a candidate who withdraws from the race or dies before the election can be held could still be on the ballot. Ken Bickers. A simple change in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could fix the flaw and still provide the benefits of a popular election. Pros & Cons of a National Popular Vote Buy Complete Issue $19.95 Login or Subscribe The National Popular Vote How would the interstate compact work? Dont know what Ranked Choice Voting is? The National Popular Vote (NPV) refers to the concept of allocating a state's presidential electors to the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide regardless of the state results in a presidential election. It has been enacted by twelve states, which include Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, New Jersey, Illinois, New York, and California. ThoughtCo. A candidate can win the popular vote in enough states to win a majority of electoral votes but still lose the popular vote nationally. A plan to enact the National Popular Vote was introduced in the Michigan Legislature on Wednesday. 4. This has occurred in 5 of the nation's 56 presidential elections, most recently in 2016. It would be a national mandate to put someone in office, even if that winning candidate received less than 50% of the vote. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. There are logistical issues that are managed at the local level in each election. In 2016, Florida had 29 electoral votes and 9.4 million voters, created a voter value of 0.72. every decade states are redistricted could be redrawn to capture house seats and corrupt the Presidential election Con:not Eliminate possibility that loser of the popular vote can still win the electoral vote The Proportional Plan A proposed reform where each presidential candidate would receive the percent of electoral votes that they win from each state Proportional Plan Pro:Possible for loser of popular vote to win presidency. The National Popular Vote compact would have the same effect as a constitutional amendment to abolish the Electoral College but has the benefit of retaining the power to control presidential elections in states hands. National Popular Vote: A Status Update - FairVote 1, 2023 at 1:16 PM PST. This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. . Or states might explore what was recently proposed in Colorado -- that electors be allocated in proportion to each candidate's share of the popular vote above a certain threshold. However, many people believe that a direct popular election is more democratic and fair than the Electoral College. Under the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system votes in small states, like Wyoming or Delaware count double what votes in large states like California or Texas. Even though we will be able to elect the president by national popular vote using the The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, eventually the rules for how we elect the president should be an official part of the Constitution. Inside Ohio or Florida, to pick two examples, the big cities do not receive all the attention, and they certainly do not control the outcome. That effectively means that votes in the the 75% of the country that are in swing states effectively dont count at all. And thats not how it should be in a democracy. National Popular Vote (NPV) was founded in 2006 by lottery scratch-card inventor John Koza and election lawyer Barry Fadem to lobby for an "interstate compact" for states to deliver their electoral votes for President to the "winner" of the national popular vote. Probably the NPV Compact would be enacted into law with as little as a simple majority of the states and possibly even less. Our state will likely vote overwhelmingly for the Republican challenger to Barack Obama in November. The United States does not have direct election of its president, yet most national, state and local offices are filled by the candidate with the most votes. The first advantage allows for electoral votes to be fairer than the Electoral College (Richards). The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president, and it . Just another site cons of the national popular vote plan . NPV is more than a third of the way to its goal. In theory that could happen every four years. During the 2012 elections, 38 states, also known as spectator states, were ignored and forgotten. cons of the national popular vote plan Opines that the national popular vote plan is the wrong way to abolith the electoral college. Electoral College Pros and Cons - ThoughtCo District Plan by Hannah Patzer - Prezi According to the Constitution, the Electoral College is a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens (National Archives). When the Constitution was set in place in 1789, the U.S. elected its first president. The National Popular Vote Plan. To become president of the United States of America, you must be at least 35 years old, have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years and be a natural-born citizen. Although moving to a popular vote election would balance the weight of each vote, it would also create more sway in larger population states. Instead, each state and Washington D.C. is assigned a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. Under the system of proportional representation, any party with a high enough percentage of the vote will receive a seat in the government. Hillary Clinton, but won the electoral vote to become the 45thPresident of the United States. PBS: What does voter turnout tell us about the 2016 election. Pros & Cons of Selecting Government Officials by Direct Election 1. Advantage: Encourages Voter Turnout But don't forget, Bush won the popular vote four years later by three million votes. Weve already seen this issue take place with the GOP primaries in 2016. Under the electoral college system, if a state consistently pulls as leaning to one party, someone who supports the other party may not vote because they feel like there isnt a need to do so. It is our national motto and is so for a reason. If this happens many people in the red states will not feel that the change is legitimate even if its legal and technically constitutional. There would be fewer opportunities to illegally alter the results of an election. Their vote only counts at the local level, not the national level, because of the electoral votes. Some states, such as California and Hawaii, both had their bills vetoed by their governors before it was overridden and enacted by state legislators. The appeal of NPV is the simplicity of its message. The plan would not get rid of the Electoral College. and our Retrieved from https://samploon.com/electoral-college-and-national-popular-vote-pros-and-cons/, Should the Electoral College Be Abolished, Pros for The Electoral College in the United States, Electoral College is Undemocratic but We Have no Better System, The Electoral College Should Be Terminated, The Electoral College Annotated Bibliography.